"

maybe if the global timeline’s less cluttered we’ll start to focus more on what’s happening in front of our noses. If it’s relatively quiet, David Cameron is likely to start getting it in the neck. If anyone has benefited from an action-packed year, it’s him. Every time the shit was about to hit the fan for Cameron in 2011, something spectacular happened somewhere else on the map and he somehow managed to slip away unscathed during the commotion. It’s as though no-one genuinely believes he’s responsible for anything, in much the same way as no-one seems to blame Ant and Dec for shoving cockroaches up Fatima Whitbread’s nose because they’re merely the frontmen…

…I wouldn’t be surprised to discover Cameron has been making all this news up: he’s paying the media to run entirely fictional stories to distract us whenever he cocks up – just like the fictional military campaign in Wag the Dog but with a bit more variety. If that’s the case, then I have a newfound respect for the prime minister: he has a vivid imagination. That nuclear reactor thing in Japan was a bold move….

"

Charlie Brooker : The Guardian

Brendan O’Neil is worse than Topman Tshirts, and Topman Tshirts are shit.

Rather typically, anger has inspired  me to once again put fingers to keyboards after a quiet spell on tumblr.

I’m about to be one of those moaning internet bloggers for five minutes. I’ll try to post something artsy-fartsy afterwards, or something astoundingly hilarious. Failing that i’ll just reblog a mildly amusing meme like everyone does….

In a piece about ‘feminist’ reaction to the two awful Topman Tshirts, (you know the ones, the really misogynistic ones, the one’s full of ‘LAD’ banter, you know, Oh wait you’re right, that’s ALL of them, but remember the two that likened women to dogs and might have suggested that there’s always an excuse for domestic violence, well we’re talking about those ones) Brendan O’Neil (telegraph) named his article ‘Why are feminists getting their knickers in a twist about Topman T-shirts?’. I hoped, upon stumbling across this title, that the article which followed would rightly explain why these T-shirts caused such a stir -namely that it made such derogatory ‘banter’ a worrying part of normal day-to-day life, thus making his title rather witty- directly drawing attention to the danger of a casual sexist behavior developing.

But no. Brandon was not being witty or ironic. He instead went on to claim that the reason feminists were angry was because feminists

are driven by the elitist belief that there are some people out there (whisper it: working-class lads) who cannot distinguish right from wrong and therefore must have their eyes and ears protected from poisonous words”. 

How a man can get so confused as to honestly suggest the feminist movement is secretly about class, and not gender at all, is quite ridiculous.

It’s more worrying that Brendon doesn’t realise that he himself, evidently middle class from his profession, doesn’t realise that he might be the feminists problem, since it’s just those ‘working class’ men the feminists don’t like. It says far more about Brandon’s own ideas of social classes than it ever does about the feminist.

He hasn’t realised that his commentary is exactly why feminists are angry.

What a posh, snobbish, sexist git. 

pantslessprogressive:

Fox News Airs Hour-Long Special On Liberal Media Bias

Well thank goodness Fox News is on hand to give us a well balanced HOUR LONG special on just how biased “liberal” media is….
Paradox!?

pantslessprogressive:

Fox News Airs Hour-Long Special On Liberal Media Bias

Well thank goodness Fox News is on hand to give us a well balanced HOUR LONG special on just how biased “liberal” media is….

Paradox!?

Headline ‘buzz words’…
I understand headlines can’t be too wordy, but I do hate it when various ‘buzz words’ are chosen and then pieced together in a rambling incoherent manner.
In my mind, that headline does not mean what the story was actually about.

Headline ‘buzz words’…

I understand headlines can’t be too wordy, but I do hate it when various ‘buzz words’ are chosen and then pieced together in a rambling incoherent manner.

In my mind, that headline does not mean what the story was actually about.